| Niyamam AI

Displaying 111 - 115 of 494

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Radhakrishnan et al vs Lissy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Original Suit

Original Suit No.426/2022

Varkala

2025-11-24

approximately-3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 343/ 2025

Varkala

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 315/2025

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-12-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Faisy (Abdul Faisy) vs Jaseera regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.127/2022

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-06-17

approximately-3 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 443/2023

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram

2025-08-20

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence During Hearings

Most cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during key court hearings or trials.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or case arguments.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

No Legal Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs appearing without legal counsel or representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Cases Not Pressed by Counsel

Several cases faced dismissal as they were not pressed or pursued by the plaintiff's legal counsel.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Legal Representation

Cases Not Pressed by Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?