| Niyamam AI

Displaying 281 - 285 of 754

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Chereekandy Gopinath vs Chereekandy Vijayan et al regarding fixation of boundaries and injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.139/2018

Kozhikode

2025-03-17

approximately-7 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 585/2018

Kozhikode District

2025-03-27

approximately-6 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Thondiyil Kallyani et al regarding recovery of possession of property

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.573/2017

Kozhikode Thaluk and District

2025-03-29

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 229 / 2020

Kozhikode District

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 8 months 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.35/2021

Kozhikode district

2025-01-06

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiff's inability to establish ownership over the disputed property led to dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's or counsel's inability to appear in court.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Maintainable Claims

Several suits were dismissed as they did not meet legal or procedural standards for maintainability.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Non-Maintainable Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?