| Niyamam AI

Displaying 261 - 265 of 753

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 14 / 2021

Kozhikode

2025-07-05

approximately-4 years 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 345/2016

Kozhikode

2025-07-19

approximately-9 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 197/2018

Kozhikode

2025-07-29

approximately-7 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Edoli Pankajam vs Pulparambil Aneesh, Ralanth Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 242/2020

Kozhikode

2025-07-31

approximately-5 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Prakasini K. vs Kamala et al regarding cancellation of document and partition

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 357/2021

Kozhikode

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to provide sufficient evidence establishing ownership of the disputed property.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Multiple suits were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs or their legal representatives during court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Lack of adequate evidence often led to dismissals, particularly for injunctions and easement rights.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Maintainability of Suit

Several cases were dismissed as non-maintainable due to jurisdictional issues or prior resolutions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Insufficient Evidence for Claims

Non-Maintainability of Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?