| Niyamam AI

Displaying 686 - 690 of 751

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Nimisha Shinil et al regarding maintainability of suit for fixation of boundaries and injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.22/2022

2024-07-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sajeevan vs Ratheesh et al regarding mandatory and temporary prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 145/2017

Ernakulam District

2024-03-12

approximately-6 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 75/2024

Ernakulam

2025-06-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2016

2019-05-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between St. Antony's Church, Vaduthala et al vs Paul @ Ouso Paul regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 544/2011

Ernakulam

2025-11-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs frequently could not prove ownership of the property, leading to dismissal of their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence and Documentation

Many plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence and documentation to support their claims, resulting in court dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during court proceedings, indicating lack of seriousness.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-compliance with Legal Procedures

Some cases failed because plaintiffs did not adhere to required legal procedures or deadlines.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Lack of Evidence and Documentation

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Non-compliance with Legal Procedures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?