| Niyamam AI

Displaying 556 - 560 of 751

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Landmark Builders vs M/s Regional Sports Centre regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 654/2023

Ernakulam

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dibu Paul et al vs Johny et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No.377/2019

2025-11-29

approximately-6 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suhara vs Muhammed Salam et al regarding partition and consequential injunction.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.139/2019

Perumbavoor

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shajeena Shameem vs Subaida regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.224/2018

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-11-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Venugopal vs Chandran et al regarding specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property

Civil Suit

O. S. No.136/2024

Perumbavoor

2025-10-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiff failed to establish ownership of the disputed property, leading to dismissals across multiple cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear in court or provide representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs could not present adequate evidence to support their claims or establish a prima facie case.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Previous Legal Resolutions

Court dismissals occurred due to prior determinations on similar matters barring new claims.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of the Plaintiff

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Previous Legal Resolutions

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?