| Niyamam AI

Displaying 861 - 865 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between S. Prasanna Babu vs Soumya.C.S regarding possession of petition schedule building

Rent Control Petition

RCP.No.1/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muralidharan Pillai. N vs Dhanalekshmi et al regarding possession of a building

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P.No.51/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between James Fletcher vs Ramakrishnan Ravi regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P.No.37/2021

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Prathapachandran vs B. Vasanthakumari regarding rent eviction

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P.No.39/2016

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-02

approximately-5 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between R.Meena Devi vs K.P.Saxon regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

RCP.No.68/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-06-16

approximately-1 year 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Representation by Plaintiffs

The plaintiffs were often absent or lacked adequate representation during hearings, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Petitions Not Pressed

Numerous petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs or their counsel decided not to pursue them further.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Evidence or Proof

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence or proof to establish their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Comply with Legal Fees

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not pay necessary court fees or comply with statutory requirements.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Representation by Plaintiffs

Petitions Not Pressed

Absence of Evidence or Proof

Failure to Comply with Legal Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?