| Niyamam AI

Displaying 841 - 845 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muralidharan T.A. vs Namitha M. regarding eviction and arrears of rent

Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition No.45/2025

Kozhikode

2025-12-12

approximately-1 year 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.Vasu et al vs CK Habeeb Rahman regarding eviction.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 101/2022

Kozhikode

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.Vasu et al vs T.K.Vijayan regarding eviction.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 106/2022

Kozhikode

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.Vasu et al vs Gopikumar regarding eviction.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 87/2022

Kozhikode

2025-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K Jyothish vs Mythri Nidhi Ltd regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 85/2024

Kozhikode

2025-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Appear in Court

Plaintiffs were frequently absent during hearings, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs' counsel chose not to pursue the cases actively.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissals occurred due to absence of legal representation from the plaintiffs at hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence, resulting in dismissal of their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Appear in Court

Petition Not Pressed

Lack of Representation

Insufficient Evidence Presented

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?