| Niyamam AI

Displaying 386 - 390 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 64/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-03-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 14/2025

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-03-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 15/2025

Kerala

2025-03-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 9/2025

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-03-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs M. Sreevidhya regarding realization of loan amount.

Commercial Suit

Commercial Suit No.712/2021

KOZHIKODE

2025-01-17

approximately-4 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing cases was common when plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence for their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs or their counsel did not press the cases.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?