| Niyamam AI

Displaying 356 - 360 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.266/2024

Kottayam

2025-01-04

approximately-1 year 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs SHAKE DARWESH, AMMED regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 105/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SASI. A. K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 50/2025

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs VARGHESE et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 27/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-09-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THRESIAMMA et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 72/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-04-05

approximately-0 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of required batta fees, leading to dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Many plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence regarding the respondent's means to pay the decree debt.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to appear or present their case during hearings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Failure to Press Suit

Plaintiffs often had their cases dismissed because they did not actively press or represent their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Press Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?