| Niyamam AI

Displaying 241 - 245 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Soumya S et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 259/2022

Kottayam, Kerala

2025-11-14

approximately-8 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Ashmi Suresh et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 333/2025

Kottayam

2025-11-18

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shiney et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 164/2025

Kottayam

2025-11-18

approximately-14 years 4 months 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Anitha V et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 625/2024

Kottayam

2025-11-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Sethumohan P S et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 244/2025

Kottayam

2025-11-17

approximately-3 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed cases due to lack of payment for necessary court fees or litigation expenses.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were lost because the plaintiff failed to appear in court, leading to automatic dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required procedural steps, leading to defaults or dismissals.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?