| Niyamam AI

Displaying 166 - 170 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Aswathy Pramod et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.107/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-18

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Anilkumar regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.111/2024

Vaikom, Kottayam District

2025-06-18

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Darsana Lenin et al regarding realisation of money.

Original Suit

O.S No.113/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-18

approximately-1 year 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Anila Varghese et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.239/2022

Vaikom, Kottayam District

2025-06-18

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Noby vs Musthafa regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 17/2021

Vaikom, Kerala

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Supporting Claims

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving the defendants' ability to pay debts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Numerous petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs were absent or failed to have representation in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Dismissals frequently occurred due to plaintiffs not providing necessary documentation to support their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Supporting Claims

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?