| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1481 - 1485 of 2453

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 672/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-24

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Sri. Sajith K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 776/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Shyni K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 918 /2024

2025-03-25

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Elvakkattu Mills et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 735/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-26

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Bibin Moncy, Moncy T.U regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 515/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

221

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

39%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay required fees or batta for ongoing proceedings.

Found in 39 cases (39%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Numerous cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent or failed to provide representation during trials.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present necessary evidence regarding respondents' means to pay and other critical aspects.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Case

Some suits were dismissed because the plaintiffs or their counsel did not press their case, leading to automatic dismissal.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Failure to Press the Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?