| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1456 - 1460 of 2453

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Sri. Rajesh K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1346/2024

Ernakulam

2025-04-09

approximately-1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Sri. Anu Mohan regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 364/2024

Ernakulam

2025-04-10

approximately-0 years 3 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Amjad Babu regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 357 /2024

2025-04-11

approximately-7 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashwin A.S vs Anil Kumar et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 425/2024

Ernakulam

2025-04-11

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dadha Pharma Distributors Private Limited vs Mr. Meenapallil Lakshmanan Arunya regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 41/2021

Ernakulam

2025-03-01

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

221

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed cases due to non-payment of required batta or court fees.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the payability of debts by defendants.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear or was not represented in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Numerous suits were dismissed when plaintiffs did not actively pursue or press their claims in court.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?