| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1266 - 1270 of 2454

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Baiju Mathew vs Gigi Martin et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 753 of 2020

Ernakulam

2024-03-30

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Ltd. vs KUDUMBASREE DIV 21 NHG 24SNEHA et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 784/2022

Ernakulam

2024-03-30

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ltd vs Mr.Nadarajan regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 304/2022

2024-03-30

approximately-2 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Indian Overseas Bank vs Mr.Haneef A.N regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 32/2023

Ernakulam

2024-02-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Associated Rubber Chemicals (Kochi) Pvt. Ltd vs M/s. Hintannia Plastic Pvt.Ltd regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1006 of 2023

Ernakulam

2024-02-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

222

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff failing to pay the required batta fees.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions were commonly dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means

Dismissals frequently occurred when plaintiffs failed to provide evidence of the defendant's means to pay debts.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Default for Lack of Representation

Numerous cases were dismissed due to a lack of legal representation for the plaintiff.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence of Means

Default for Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?