| Niyamam AI

Displaying 776 - 780 of 2451

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Fredi et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.710/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-26

approximately-10 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Seena G.C regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No 1541/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-27

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1380/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-28

approximately-10 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Najeeb Khan regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1355/2022

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajeev Kumar vs N.C.S Autohub Pvt. Ltd et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1105/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

219

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary batta fees for proceedings.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

A significant number of cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of legal representation.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence on Respondents' Means

Dismissals frequently occurred due to insufficient evidence regarding the financial means of the respondents to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Several suits were dismissed as plaintiffs did not provide the required court fees for their claims.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Lack of Evidence on Respondents' Means

Failure to Pay Court Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?