| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3891 - 3895 of 22150

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Karthikeyan et al vs P.G.Raveendran et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1293/2002

Ernakulam

2024-12-13

approximately-22 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED vs Smt. Nimisha. M. Sunil, Sri. Sunil.M.T regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 411/2023

Ernakulam

2024-12-13

approximately-11 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pathrose et al vs Ithappiri et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.594/1989

Ernakulam

2024-12-13

approximately-35 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Jithin M.A et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 970/2023

2024-12-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hind Agencies vs MPS India Holding Private Limited et al regarding Money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 386/2022

Ernakulam

2024-12-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9770

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Majority of petitions were dismissed for default due to non-payment of necessary fees or batta.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear in court without valid reasons.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?