| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3806 - 3810 of 22119

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between John Paulose et al vs Biju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 45 / 2024

2024-09-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 33 / 2016

2024-09-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binu.K.Mathew et al vs George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS No. 50/2023

2024-09-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Fr. Saji.C.John vs Johnson et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 57/2022

2024-10-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kuriachan P.J et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 34/2020

2024-11-05

approximately-4 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9755

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims or prove the means of respondents.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not pay necessary fees or batta for legal proceedings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiffs did not take required steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear at the scheduled hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?