| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20321 - 20325 of 21896

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Mukthar regarding suit restoration

Civil Suit

EP 157/2016

Tirur,Malappuram

2017-07-20

1 year, 1 month, 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Parameswaran. V. regarding debt recovery

Execution Petition - Debt Recovery

EP 253/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-20

0 years, 8 months, 1 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between SML Finance Limited et al vs Suresh et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 231 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-07-19

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bharathy Auto Finance and Shamsudheen regarding money suit

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 119 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-07-18

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erukattil Thami et al vs Karattu Kadavath Rasheed et al regarding easement right dispute

Civil Suit - Prohibitory Injunction

Original Suit No. 343 OF 2005

Tirur

2017-07-18

11 years and 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9646

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or respond effectively.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear in court as required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often neglected to issue necessary legal notices, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?