| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18481 - 18485 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary vs Sasidharan Devaruparambil et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 367/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.K. Hamza vs K.P. Muhammed Ali regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:33/2018

Tirur

2019-02-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Vinod Chakkanath et al regarding decree execution

Decree Execution

EP 371/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-21

0 years, 2 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sudheesh vs Moidutty Haji regarding petition for restoration

Restor.Ptn

KLML130002482018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 11 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sharas et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

EP 374/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-22

0 years, 2 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default in various petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not present adequate evidence to prove their case, resulting in dismissal for lack of merit.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during the hearings, leading to automatic default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?