| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1116 - 1120 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Mr. Madhu K.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 10/2025

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-9 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashok Babu vs Mary Joseph et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 95/2019

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-6 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Reenu Singh vs Varghese Rajan et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 107.2025

Kottayam

2025-12-20

approximately-1 year 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Fazil Abdulkhadar et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. 211/2024

Kottayam District

2025-12-20

approximately-4 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Nagambadom Sivagiri Teerthadana Pathayathra Samithy et al vs Raghu P.S et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.

Interlocutory Application

OS 439/2025

Kottayam

2025-12-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, leading to dismissal.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to appear in court during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary procedural steps to advance their cases.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?