| Niyamam AI

Displaying 56 - 60 of 21805

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jameela vs Amanulla et al regarding declaration, mandatory injunction, and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 291/2016

Kollam

2025-11-20

approximately-9 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 601/2024

Kollam

2025-11-20

approximately-1 year 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sindhu vs Sathyan regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 603/2021

Kollam

2025-11-20

approximately-5 years 9 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Sreelekshmi.M.B. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 610/2022

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-4 years 5 months 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs M/s ARC Render regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 889/2024

Kollam

2025-11-21

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees or batta, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Court dismissed cases where the petitioner was absent during hearings without valid reasons.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' failure to present sufficient evidence supporting their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?