| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3871 - 3875 of 22110

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thomas Mannully et al vs Abdul Jaleel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 594/2011

Ernakulam

2024-12-11

approximately-13 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jayasree Santhosh vs Sajamma et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1451/2016

Ernakulam

2024-12-12

approximately-10 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Smt. Smitha Pillai regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 270/2020

Ernakulam

2024-12-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Honey Ravindran @ Arjun Ravindran vs P M Bava regarding temporary injunction for film rights

Injunction

O.S. No. 1193/2024

Ernakulam

2024-12-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Paul Joseph et al vs John et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No . 513/2016

Ernakulam

2024-12-12

approximately-8 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9747

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to non-payment of necessary fees required for proceeding the case.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Case dismissal often occurred due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the financial means of respondents.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Many plaintiffs failed for not taking essential procedural steps such as issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissing petitions often resulted from the petitioner's failure to appear in court during proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?