| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3596 - 3600 of 22007

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Valsala vs Sasidharan Nadar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1687/2013

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-18

approximately-11 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Marwin Apparels et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS.No.2024/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-18

approximately-8 years 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s VIBGYOR regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.409/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-18

approximately-9 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shobha et al vs Manju et al regarding compromise agreement

Injunction

OS.No.14/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-18

approximately-3 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nataraja Pillai et al vs Venkadasalam regarding review of order in money recovery suit

Review Application

O.S. No. 1108/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-02-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9695

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently dismissed due to non-payment of court fees required for proceedings or notices.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs were absent from court hearings or failed to appear for their cases.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or filing documents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?