| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2636 - 2640 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sushama vs Suseela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 402/2019

Varkala

2025-10-25

approximately-6 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank, Varkala Branch vs Biju. S. regarding loan recovery.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 334/ 2022

Varkala

2025-10-31

approximately-6 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sasidharan vs Aswin regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 45/2023

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-10-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018

Varkala

2025-11-01

approximately-7 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chellamma et al vs Indira et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 489/2018

Varkala Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-01

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees or costs, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals occurred due to insufficient evidence regarding financial means or other critical elements.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Plaintiffs were not present at hearings, which resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Lack of proper notice issuance led to dismissals of petitions and claims.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation in Court

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?