| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20331 - 20335 of 21895

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed vs Pachu et al regarding petition dismissal

Civil Suit

EP 269/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-13

2 years, 7 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Karappan et al regarding default in remitting batta

Civil Suit - Default in Remitting Batta

EP 225/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-13

0 years, 8 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Riyas.K regarding realization of amount

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 11 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-07-11

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Thaikootathil Hameed regarding debt payment

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 34/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-11

0 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gopi vs K.P.Lakshmanan regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:17/2017

Tirur

2017-07-10

less than 1 year

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9645

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or respond effectively.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear in court as required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often neglected to issue necessary legal notices, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?