| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18481 - 18485 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M.K. Hamza vs K.P. Muhammed Ali regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:33/2018

Tirur

2019-02-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed kutty vs Ponmalathodi Velayudhan Nair regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 285 OF 2016

Tirur Taluk

2019-02-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sudheesh vs Moidutty Haji regarding petition for restoration

Restor.Ptn

KLML130002482018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 11 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sharas et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

EP 374/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-22

0 years, 2 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Shoukath Ali Pokkatt et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 377/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-22

0 years, 2 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

21%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to their inability to pay the required court fees or batta.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence regarding financial means led to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioners not appearing in court.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to properly issue notices to respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?