| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18096 - 18100 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary vs Abdurehiman Kundil et al regarding dismissal for default.

Execution Petition

EP 384/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-08-27

0 years, 8 months, 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding alleged commission of offense punishable u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

Criminal Case

S.T.No:17/2018

Tirur

2019-08-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Seema Ala.K vs The General Convenor, Programme Committee et al regarding Original Petit No. 6 of 2018

Original Petition

KLML130001562018

Malappuram

2019-08-29

1 years, 6 months, 29 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moideen. P vs Abdu regarding offence under N.I. Act

Injunction

S.T. No:116/2017

Tirur

2019-08-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Krishnan Chettiar vs Unnikrishnan @ Mani regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 140 OF 2016

2019-08-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Dismissals occurred when petitioners failed to appear in court when required.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?