| Niyamam AI

Displaying 766 - 770 of 21886

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Central Financial Credit and Investment Co-operative India Ltd. vs Gladson K.V regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST-15/2023

Vaikom, Kottayam District

2025-02-28

approximately-5 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.S.Suseeladevi @ Suseela vs Seetha et al regarding mandatory as well as permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No.261/2020

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-21

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.

Civil Suit

OS No. 77/2020

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Santhosh vs Pushkaran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No.95/2021

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-3 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Xavier.N.J. vs Jayakumar.P.K. regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 136/2021

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay the required court fees, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove means of repayment.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs at scheduled hearings.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?