| Niyamam AI

Displaying 486 - 490 of 21877

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Johnson Louise Lopus vs N.S Unni et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 308/2018

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-7 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thampi vs Balan et al regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 552/2019

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sujith vs Renjith et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS. No. 665/2021

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vimalamma vs Sabeena Beevi et al regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 763/2017

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-7 years 8 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd vs Sajeev. I et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 512/2022

Kollam

2025-06-30

approximately-9 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed cases due to non-payment of batta, preventing processes from proceeding.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Frequent dismissals occurred due to the plaintiffs failing to provide necessary evidence to verify claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Cases were often dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent during hearings, leading to automatic defaults.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to issue notices to respondents, leading to case dismissals due to lack of proper procedure.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?