| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4171 - 4175 of 22037

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Xavier T.E et al vs Rosy Varghese et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 414/2023

2024-07-01

approximately-0 years 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between J.K Enterprises vs Rajesh T.R regarding money lending dispute

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 549/2019

Ernakulam

2024-07-01

approximately-8 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Synidicate Bank vs Ansil A regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 273/2019

2024-07-02

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nadhirsha Moideen vs M/s JVJ Projects Private Limited regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 587/2022

Ernakulam

2024-07-02

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Chinju Madhu et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1024/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9711

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Inadequate evidence was a common factor, leading to dismissal of cases due to inability to prove financial means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often did not undertake necessary procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed when petitioners were absent from court proceedings, undermining their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?