| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3566 - 3570 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Sunil Kumar et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1138/2019

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-22

approximately-5 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Susheela Devi. B. et al vs Anil Kumar et al regarding putting up of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1407/2015

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-24

approximately-9 years 10 months 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Sindhu.S regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.2063/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-24

approximately-6 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Richmond Uniforms, Raveendran Kunju Panicker et al vs Bijin Babu regarding perpetual and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.241/2019

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-24

approximately-6 years 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Madusoodanan et al vs Sreelekha et al regarding IA.No. 7/2024

Civil Suit

OS. No. 232/2013

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-24

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to non-payment of necessary fees required to process their petitions.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Default Due to Absence

Dismissals often occurred due to the plaintiffs' absence in court, resulting in automatic defaults.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to the defendants, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?