| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2611 - 2615 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sulfi Jihan vs Sumisha, Yasin et al regarding ad-interim injunction.

Civil Suit

OS NO. 331/ 2025

Varkala

2025-09-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sindhu et al vs Bibin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 74/2022

Varkala

2025-09-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subash vs Nalini regarding eviction and damages.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 172/2021

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-09-22

approximately-5 years 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 439/2023

Varkala Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-09-23

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohanachandran Nair et al vs Kerala State Government et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 94/2022

Varkala

2025-09-23

approximately-3 years 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Frequent dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary court fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Dismissals frequently resulted from plaintiffs' inaction in taking required legal steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Cases were commonly dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear for hearings or court proceedings.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?