| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20731 - 20735 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sasi vs Anitha T et al regarding Suit Restoration

Civil Suit

EP/116/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-12-07

0 years, 8 months, 3 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Aboobakar vs Abdul Salam et al regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

EP 160/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-12-07

0 years, 5 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subaida.K. vs Saithalikutty et al regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

EP 205/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-12-05

0 years, 3 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulaikaha vs Saithalikutty et al regarding property delivery

Execution Petition

Execution Petition No. 164 of 2016

Tirur

2016-12-03

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Shyja et al vs Accomplish Marketing Compan(Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding realization of amount

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 250 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-12-02

Not mentioned

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioners failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal for default in several cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents contributed to the dismissal of numerous petitions.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in dismissals for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

The absence of the petitioner during hearings was a recurring reason for the dismissal of petitions.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?