| Niyamam AI

Displaying 19966 - 19970 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jaisal vs Accomplishing Marketing Company regarding Not mentioned

Not mentioned

Restor.P 2833/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-12-21

0 years, 0 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between U.V. Pratheeshkumar vs Adiparambil Kunhalavi regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 152 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-21

1 year

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Hameed vs Kunheerukutty Hajjumma et al regarding partition

Partition Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 313 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-21

Approximately 1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Balan vs Adiparambil Kunhalavi regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 377 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-12-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manikandan vs Babu Rajan regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 388 OF 20 16

Tirur

2017-12-21

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees or batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present adequate evidence to support their claims.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Court frequently dismissed cases due to the absence of the plaintiff during hearings.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Necessary Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?