| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18301 - 18305 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 OF 2015

Tirur Taluk

2019-06-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P.P. Kumaran vs P.P. Aramughan et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 342/2018

Malappuram

2019-06-19

0 years, 6 months, 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Balan Nalukandathil et al regarding decree satisfaction

Execution Petition

KLML130009662018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-06-25

0 years, 6 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Naufal et al regarding execution proceedings.

Execution Proceeding

EP 119/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-06-27

1 years, 0 months, 4 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jamsheer vs Nazar regarding Offence under Negotiable Instrument Act

Criminal Case

S.T. :152/2017

Tirur

2019-06-25

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Dismissals often occurred due to insufficient evidence presented to support claims.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation by Plaintiff

Cases were often dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear or represent themselves.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Plaintiffs sometimes did not issue required notices to defendants, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Non-Representation by Plaintiff

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?