| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18231 - 18235 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Dr. Senthilkumar regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T.No:12/2018

Tirur

2019-07-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Manshan Nasheed et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 452/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-29

0 years, 7 months, 8 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sayyid Shihabudheen Haris vs Sulaiman regarding offence under N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:58/2016

Tirur

2019-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sayyid Shihabudheen Haris vs Sulaiman regarding offense under N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:59/2016

Tirur

2019-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ullattodiyil Sunilkumar vs Ullattodiyil Karthiyayani regarding EP dismissal.

Execution Petition

EP 79/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-29

1 years, 4 months, 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to prove claims or support arguments resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking necessary procedural steps.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Petitioners' absence during proceedings led to frequent dismissals of cases for default.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?