| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18056 - 18060 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Parammal Kunhahammed's children vs Ullattil Usha regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 252 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-08-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Bhaskaran Padancheri regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 22/2019

Malappuram

2019-08-13

0 years, 6 months, 27 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha vs K.Kunhimon et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

KLML130002162018

Malappuram

2019-08-13

1 years, 5 months, 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Unikkattu Valappil Vijayan vs Unikkattu Valappil Manikandan regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 5 OF 2019

2019-08-09

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs BHaskaran Padnacheri regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 23/2019

Malappuram

2019-08-14

0 years, 6 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary batta fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence regarding respondents' financial means to pay debts.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

No Steps Taken to Issue Notice

Plaintiffs did not take necessary actions to issue notices to respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the absence of petitioners in court during proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Steps Taken to Issue Notice

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?