| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17901 - 17905 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Siddeekh et al regarding EP 203/2019

Execution Petition

KLML130004652019

Malappuram

2019-10-26

0 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anwar Sadath vs Siddique regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 3 OF 2019

Tirur Taluk

2019-10-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed kutty vs Muhammed Rafi regarding decree enforcement.

Execution Petition

EP 142/2019

Malappuram

2019-10-28

0 years, 7 months, 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Prasanth.K.P. et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

KLML130004212019

Malappuram

2019-10-28

0 years, 5 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pulikalakath Pareekutty Haji vs Theyyampatil Sharafuddeen regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

KLML130007312019

Malappuram

2019-10-28

0 years, 3 months, 4 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petition dismissed because the plaintiff failed to pay necessary legal fees.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence to support claims or prove the means of the respondent led to case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Petitioner Absent in Court

Dismissals frequently occurred due to the petitioner's absence during hearings and lack of representation.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Cases were dismissed for plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioner Absent in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?