| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17816 - 17820 of 21939

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Parvathy Ammal (Died), Bhageeradhi Ammal et al vs Kunjumol Thankappan regarding payment of ₹. 50,000/-

Execution Petition

E.P. No. 50/2023

2025-03-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.G. Govindan Nair vs Kousalya et al regarding petition not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 412/2016

2025-03-21

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Aboobacker vs M.H. Shabeer regarding suit not pressed

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 55/2025

Perumbavoor

2025-03-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Thomas P.D regarding suit not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 210/2023

Perumbavoor

2025-03-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Keram Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Athen Enterprises regarding settlement of claim

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 351/2024

Perumbavoor, Kerala

2025-03-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9668

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees for processing or issuing notices, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs during hearings, indicating lack of prosecution.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Inaction on Case Steps

Repeated defaults occurred when plaintiffs took no action to advance their cases, such as issuing required notices.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Inaction on Case Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?