| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1346 - 1350 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. M.M Publications Ltd. vs P S Mohammed Basheer regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T.96/2020

Kottayam

2025-05-09

approximately-6 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Naseer T R vs Sabu Thomas @ Chacko Thomas regarding Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST 73/2021

Kottayam

2025-05-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Keerthi Hire Purchase and Credits Ltd. vs Pandi Rajeswari regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case

S.T. 84 /2021

Kottayam

2025-04-30

approximately-3 years 8 months 9 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thomas Pathrose et al vs P.I.John regarding settlement of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No.225/2022

Kottayam

2025-05-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheela Somarajan et al vs Nil regarding succession certificate.

O.P. (Succession)

O. P. (SUCCESSION) No. 8/2024

Kottayam District

2025-05-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay mandatory court costs, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the financial means of the respondents led to dismissal of petitions.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Cases were dismissed when the petitioners failed to appear for hearings or proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Petitioners did not take required steps to issue notices to respondents, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?