| Niyamam AI

Displaying 766 - 770 of 21886

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thankappan vs Jineesh.P.U regarding fixation of boundary.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 105/2022

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.Padmakumari vs Sreeram.P.S. et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.128/2024

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-27

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. vs Rajimol et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.174/2024

2025-02-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Thomas Ulahannan et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.246/2023

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-28

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Vishnu Valsan et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.264/2024

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-27

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Non-Representation at Hearings

Frequent failure to appear or be represented led to dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation at Hearings

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?