| Niyamam AI

Displaying 716 - 720 of 21884

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Noby vs Musthafa regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 17/2021

Vaikom, Kerala

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Valsala Purushothaman Pillai vs Mohanan et al regarding declaration of shifting of pathway

Civil Suit

O.S No.81/2018

Vaikom

2025-06-30

approximately-7 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Shylasree Shaji et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.139/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-28

approximately-1 year 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Noby vs Musthafa regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 17/2021

Vaikom

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Saranya et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.226/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-28

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay batta, leading to dismissal for non-compliance with procedural requirements.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' inaction, such as not issuing notices or taking necessary legal steps.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Cases were often dismissed when petitioners failed to appear in court or provide representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?