| Niyamam AI

Displaying 631 - 635 of 21881

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sandeep.P.R. vs Sajeevan.K.T. regarding return of money advanced

Civil Suit

O.S No. 44/2022

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-11-29

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chandramohandas et al vs Sani regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O S 137/2022

Vaikom Taluk

2025-11-29

approximately-3 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K.J.John vs Sathyan et al regarding mediation settlement

Civil Suit

O S. 153/2024

Vaikom

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Scaria Thomas vs Rajeev M.S. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS 13/2025

Vaikom, Kerala

2025-11-29

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shaji vs Thankappan, Chellamma regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O S. 41/2017

Vaikom Taluk, Kerala

2025-11-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees for court proceedings, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Absence of the plaintiff during hearings resulted in dismissals for non-representation.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs could not provide necessary evidence to support claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Steps Taken

Failure to take required procedural steps, such as notice issuance, led to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation

Failure to Provide Evidence

Insufficient Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?