| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4341 - 4345 of 15269

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vaikom Urban Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Neethumol et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP.No. 57/2023 in A.R.C. No.2646/2022

Vaikom Taluk

2025-10-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Lalitha vs Mathew Chacko regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree

Restoration

OS No. 166/2018

Vaikom

2025-10-22

approximately-1 year 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abraham John et al vs Elsamma Mathew regarding compromise petition

Civil Suit

O S 125/2023

Vaikom

2025-10-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Ullala Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs Lali Mohandas et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP.No.61/2020

Vaikom

2025-10-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vadakkeputhussery Padasekhara Nellulpadaka Samithi et al vs Suresh et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O S 35/2025

Vaikom Taluk

2025-10-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8230

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

26%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiffs During Hearings

Plaintiffs consistently failed to appear in court, leading to default judgments against them.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Failure to Present Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not provide required evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Costs and Fees

Litigants frequently failed to pay necessary costs or fees, causing their petitions to be dismissed.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Numerous cases saw dismissals due to plaintiffs lacking legal representation during hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiffs During Hearings

Failure to Present Necessary Evidence

Non-Payment of Costs and Fees

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?