| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4126 - 4130 of 15192

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST.No. 32/2021

KOLLAM

2025-04-16

approximately-5 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Gireesh vs George Vargheese George regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No.41/2018

Kollam

2025-04-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Antony vs Telma Jovita regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 40/2023

Kollam

2025-04-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Ltd vs Subiya regarding offense under N.I Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 245/2019

KOLLAM

2025-04-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sheeba Shukoor vs A.J.Biju regarding withdrawal of complaint

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 53/2023

Kollam

2025-04-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8182

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

The plaintiff was frequently absent from hearings, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary documentation, resulting in their cases being dismissed.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Frequent dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not paying required costs or fees to the court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Many cases resulted in dismissals due to the plaintiffs not being represented during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Non-Payment of Court Costs

Lack of Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?