| Niyamam AI

Displaying 306 - 310 of 15042

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.Padmakumari vs Sreeram.P.S. et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.128/2024

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-27

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Ltd. vs Rajimol et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.174/2024

2025-02-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.S.Suseeladevi @ Suseela vs Seetha et al regarding mandatory as well as permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No.261/2020

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-21

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 104/2023

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-28

approximately-8 years 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS No. 122/2022

2025-02-28

approximately-2 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8107

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Dismissal Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to automatic dismissal of their cases.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish required factors.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Frequent failures to pay court-ordered costs led to dismissal of multiple cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often did not produce necessary documentation, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Dismissal Due to Absence

Lack of Evidence Provided

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?