| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2726 - 2730 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Reji Mathew vs Mohammed Rafeek P A et al regarding settlement of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1133/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sanuraj V A regarding civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1210/2025

Ernakulam, Kerala

2026-01-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ansals Riverdale Owners Association vs N.Sugathan regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 121/2023

Ernakulam

2026-01-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ramesan vs Kumaran et al regarding execution of a decree.

Execution Petition

E.P. No. 226/2025

Ernakulam District

2026-01-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Nazir et al vs M/s GTL Infrastructure Ltd et al regarding rejection of plaint.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 831/2021

Ernakulam

2026-01-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissals for their absence or lack of representation.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Production of Required Documents

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not provide necessary documents to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take required steps, such as issuing notices or filing affidavits, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Cost-Related Non-Compliance

Several petitions were dismissed due to non-payment of costs or fees, which plaintiffs failed to meet.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Non-Production of Required Documents

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Cost-Related Non-Compliance

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?