| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2376 - 2380 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Premchandran vs Sulaiman Aboobacker Sait regarding a civil suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 201/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Zeenath Mohammed Najeeb et al vs Nazer A R et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 596/2022

Ernakulam

2025-11-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Andrew N J vs Athira Gold and Silks et al regarding a petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 679/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kalpana vs Sivaraman et al regarding appointment of an advocate commissioner for property measurement.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 859/2018

Ernakulam

2025-11-07

7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between GibinKk Varghese et al vs Sivan M G regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1066/2023

Ernakulam

2025-11-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often could not provide required documents, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not being represented by counsel.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs' dismissals were commonly linked to failure in paying necessary court fees.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Lack of Representation in Court

Non-Payment of Required Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?