| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14711 - 14715 of 15049

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Alavikutty et al vs Ummer et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 164 OF 2017

2019-12-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdu et al vs Shajimon et al regarding injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 68 OF 2019

2019-12-18

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pavithra Satheesan vs General Convener et al regarding mandatory injunction

Mandatory Injunction

Original Suit No. 317 OF 2019

2019-12-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Bharathi Auto Finance vs Shabeer regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

EXECUTION PETITION NO. 103 OF 2018

Tirur

2019-12-20

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Alungal Mariyamu Umma, Alungal Aboobacker regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction

Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 160 OF 2009

TIRUR

2019-12-19

10 years 3 months 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8112

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Dismissal Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to automatic dismissal of their cases.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish required factors.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Frequent failures to pay court-ordered costs led to dismissal of multiple cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often did not produce necessary documentation, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Dismissal Due to Absence

Lack of Evidence Provided

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Failure to Produce Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?