| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13861 - 13865 of 15096

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between C Alikutty vs Muhammed Fajish regarding offence under N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:34/2018

Tirur

2019-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Shanu Navas et al regarding decree execution.

Execution Petition

EP 232/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-08

0 years, 3 months, 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kalpakancheri Gramapanchayath vs Ali Muhammad regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 1770/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-06

0 years, 6 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Rafi vs The Vikasana Kuries Limited, Theyyath Mohandas regarding 138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:192/2017

Tirur

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Velayudhan vs Edathottil Narayanan's children regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 142 OF 2016

2019-02-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8130

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs often could not provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs being absent or lacking legal representation during hearings.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required costs or fees, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Inaction and Lack of Steps Taken

Several cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary actions, such as issuing notices or moving the case forward.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Evidence

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Default Due to Non-Payment

Inaction and Lack of Steps Taken

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?